Sunday, March 27, 2011

Foreign Exchange Markets 2010: Shaw Capital Management

The main feature of the foreign exchange markets over the past month has
been the further sharp fall in the euro. There has been no real change in
the background economic situation in the euro-zone; but there has been
a serious deterioration in the financial background as doubts have increased
about the ability of Greece and some other periphery countries to cope
with their massive fiscal deficits and service their sovereign debts.
This is clearly leading to a withdrawal of international funds from the
European capital markets, and is dramatically illustrated in the widening
of yield spreads in the bond markets of member countries.
There is still a general assumption that the stronger members will provide
support for the weaker members if this proves to be necessary to prevent
a default on sovereign debts.

But the uncertainties have been increased by conflicting statements from
the European Central Bank and some politicians about the willingness to
undertake such operations, and so investors and speculators have taken
evasive action, and the euro has fallen by around 10% from its peak in early-
December.

This fall has provided support for the other major world currencies, including
the dollar; but the background situations in Japan, and in the UK, also
provide reasons for concern, and so the currency markets remain in a very
uncertain state.

It is likely that the uncertainty will continue. The US economy is clearly
recovering from recession; economic conditions in Japan are very weak,
and Japan appears to face the possibility of a credit downgrade if it does
not take steps to reduce its massive fiscal deficit; and there have already
been warnings from Standard and Poor’s that the UK also faces the possibility
of a credit downgrade if there are no convincing measures to reduce its
huge fiscal deficit after the forthcoming general election.
Prospects are therefore very difficult to assess; but our tentative conclusion
is that the dollar will continue to “improve”, helped to a considerable extent
by weaknesses elsewhere; and that this will allow market pressures to
gradually subside as the global economic recovery continues through the
year.

But the possibility of a major currency crisis cannot
be ignored, especially if the debt problems in Greece
and other periphery countries threaten to lead to the
break-up of the single currency system in Europe.
It is fortunate therefore that the available evidence
on the performance of the US economy is more
encouraging. Non-farm payrolls fell again in December
by 85,000, but are expected to have increased in
January; retail sales held up well in the pre-Christmas
period; manufacturing output is improving, according
to the latest report from the Institute of Supply
Management; and even the housing market appears
to be recovering.

This general situation is reflected in the first
preliminary estimate from the Commerce Department
of growth at a seasonally adjusted annualised rate of
5.7% in the final quarter of last year, a higher figure
than the market had been expecting.
Most economists therefore appear to be forecasting
overall growth this year in the 2.5% to 3% range, after
the estimated fall of 2.4% last year.

The Fed is clearly in no hurry to tighten its present
monetary stance. The statement after the latest
meeting of its Open Market Committee was more
upbeat about the prospects for the economy; but shortterm
interest rates were left unchanged and close to
zero, and there was a clear indication that they would
remain at very low levels “for an extended period”.
The bank did state that it will discontinue most of its
emergency lending programmes, and that it would
end its purchases of mortgage securities in March; but
there was no indication that it would be prepared to
implement an “exit strategy” until there was
convincing evidence of a sustainable economic
recovery. It is also unlikely that there will be any early
changes in fiscal policy.

The recent State of the Union message to Congress by
President Obama included a request for the approval
of a further fiscal stimulus package this year amounting
to around $100 billion to help to tackle the
unemployment problem, and he has also presented a
$3.8 trillion budget for fiscal 2011 that is likely to
maintain the overall deficit around the $1.35 trillion
level expected this year.

Much will depend on the attitude of overseas holders,
and especially on the attitude of the Chinese and
Japanese authorities.
For the present they seem to be prepared to maintain
and even increase their dollar exposure; and if this
continues, and the problems of other major currencies
remain unresolved, it should be enough to allow the
dollar to “improve”.
The euro struggled to recover in the early part of
January from the big fall that occurred in December;
but the recovery did not last very long, and it has
subsequently fallen sharply again, to leave it value
against the dollar around 10% below the level in early-
December.

There has been no significant change in the underlying
economic background, although there is some evidence
that the fragile recovery that was developing is losing
some momentum.

But there has been a serious deterioration in the
financial background as the fears have increased that
Greece and some other periphery countries in the
euro-zone may be unable to fund their massive fiscal
deficits, and service their sovereign debts.
There is also considerable uncertainty about the
intentions of the European Central Bank and the
stronger countries if conditions continue to worsen,
and so overseas holders have started to withdraw
funds from the European capital markets to await
developments.

The present lack of urgency at the central bank and
amongst the key politicians suggests that this trend
will continue, and that the euro will fall still further;
but there is still some hope that the seriousness of the
situation will finally produce a support operation that
will ease the situation.

All the available evidence continues to point to a slow,
two-speed recovery in the euro-zone economy.
Germany and France appear to be performing
reasonably well, although there are some signs of
slowdown in Germany; but Greece, Portugal, Spain,
Ireland, and even Italy are struggling to escape from
recession, and are expected to keep overall output in
the euro-zone this year around the 1% level.

There is also considerable uncertainty about the intentions
of the European Central Bank and the stronger countries
if conditions continue to worsen, and so overseas holders
have started to withdraw funds from the European capital
markets to await developments.

Retail sales remain depressed, and fell by 1.2% between October and
November to reflect the continuing caution of consumers; and industrial
orders in Germany rose by much less than expected in November, after a
very disappointing result in October, to indicate some weakness in export
prospects that had been expected to provide significant momentum to the
economy.

Prospects therefore remain disappointing, and are being made worse by
the differences that exist between member countries.
The European Central Bank therefore faces a difficult situation. It continues
to forecast “moderate” growth and “moderate” inflation; but it is being
severely criticised for failing to address the problems of a two-speed
economy, and for its unwillingness so far to face the threat that the
deteriorating situation in Greece could quickly begin to destabilise other
member countries and have serious consequences for the financial stability
and growth prospects of the entire area.

It is not surprising therefore that investors and speculators have started
to reduce their exposure to the euro.

The critical question therefore is whether the fall of the euro is now over.
Since the currency is unlikely to receive any real support from the general
background situation in the euro-zone, everything depends on the
developing debt situation, and particularly on the situation in Greece; and
also on the possibility of support operations from stronger member countries
and from the European Central Bank, and the European Commission.
The situation remains uncertain. The central bank appears to be reluctant
to offer help, and the German government, which might have been expected
to become involved, has also made no response so far.

But the European Commission has endorsed the latest plans by the Greek
government to introduce an across-the-board freeze on public sector wages
and cuts in allowances that are expected to reduce the overall public sector
wage bill by around 4%.

This may encourage support from elsewhere; however the Commission has
warned that it will not tolerate any slippage from the target and will if
necessary demand tougher action from the government to ensure that it
stays on course.

But it is far from clear that the Greek government can obtain the necessary
support in parliament even for the present proposed measures, and so the
uncertainty will continue.

It is therefore likely that there will be further falls in the euro over the
coming weeks.

Sterling has improved slightly over the past month, helped by the weakness
of the euro.

The background situation in the UK remains unattractive, and there have
already been threats that its AAA credit rating is at risk unless there are
credible measures to reduce the massive fiscal deficit after the forthcoming
general election is over.

The European Central Bank therefore faces a
difficult situation. It continues to forecast
“moderate” growth and “moderate” inflation;
but it is being severely criticised for failing
to address the problems of a two-speed
economy, and for its unwillingness so far to
face the threat that the deteriorating situation
in Greece could quickly begin to destabilise
other member countries and have serious
consequences for the financial stability and
growth prospects of the entire area.

But the UK is not constrained by membership of the European single
currency system, and so there is no immediate risk of a default on its
sovereign debts.

It has therefore been able to benefit from the problems affecting some
other European countries.

The latest figures from the Office of National Statistics indicate that the UK
just managed to move out of recession in the final quarter of last year. The
estimate of growth of only 0.1% in the quarter was a considerable
disappointment, and it is expected that it will be revised higher; but clearly
the economy is not performing very well.

Government spending remains strong, and there was a surge in retail sales
in the run-up to Christmas; but the anecdotal evidence suggests that
consumers became much more cautious again in January.

The latest meeting of the Monetary Policy Committee of the Bank of England
was concerned by the poor reaction so far to the dramatic measures that
have been introduced to counter the recession, and reacted to this situation
by leaving UK base rates unchanged once again at 0.5%.

It clearly has no intention of moving to an “exit strategy” until there is
convincing evidence that a sustainable recovery in the economy is underway.

It did announce that purchases of market securities under the quantitative
easing programme would now be discontinued after the £200 billion target
has been reached; but its main priority is to continue to provide support
for the fragile economic recovery.

Fiscal policy is also likely to remain unchanged until after the election,
because the necessary measures to reduce the huge deficit will be unpopular,
and might influence the outcome of that election.

Sterling is therefore receiving no real support from the domestic background
situation, and in other circumstances might have been expected to move
lower.

But the problems affecting the other major global currencies, and particularly
the problems affecting the euro, have at least delayed any further falls.
The yen has improved over the past month, despite a generally unfavourable
domestic background situation, and some attempts by the Japanese
authorities to prevent its appreciation against other currencies.

It has achieved an enhanced “safe haven” status in the current storm in
the currency markets, and on the back of the relative success of its exports.
But conditions in the Japanese economy remain very weak, and there has
even been the threat of a downgrade of its credit rating unless measures
are introduced to reduce its massive fiscal deficit.

However it does not appear that this threat will prevent the new Japanese
government from introducing further measures to stimulate the economy,
and urging the Bank of Japan to intervene in the markets to weaken the
yen, and so its prospects remain very uncertain.

Shaw Capital Management Newsletter: Japan Submits Budget for 2010

The Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) government submitted to the Diet the fiscal 2010 budget amounting to ¥92.3 trillion, its first budget since its inauguration in mid-September. The budget was even larger than its counterpart for the current fiscal year — which was already a record if one includes the second supplementary stimulus package, approved last December. This was because of additional spending on child allowances, free senior high school education, cash subsidies to farmers, and higher payments to medical institutions to alleviate the shortage of medical doctors. Particularly noteworthy is the large amount devoted to social security, up to ¥27.3 trillion, which account for 51% of general public spending … the first time that the social security share has exceeded 50%. In marked contrast, public works investment, which has been cut back by almost 20%, amounts to ¥5.8 trillion, a record drop that symbolizes the DPJ’s philosophy of shifting money to people from public works... eightynine dam projects are likely to be frozen.

At a news conference, Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama described it as “a budget meant to safeguard the life of the people.” He also claimed that three reforms were incorporated in the architecture of the budget: first, the principle of a shift of priority “from concrete to people”; second, initiatives taken by politicians instead of bureaucrats; and third, securing transparency in the budget formulation process. Some creditable aspects notwithstanding, the budget bill appears to be overshadowed, as media reports made clear, by concern over a severe revenue shortage and its implications for the future of Japan’s public finances, which are already debt-laden to a perilous extent as recently pointed out by credit rating agency Standard & Poor’s which raised the prospect of a downgrade in Japan’s sovereign debt rating.

“The budget bill appears to be overshadowed by concern over a severe revenue shortage and its implications for the future of Japan’spublic finances, which are already debt-laden to a perilous extent.”

“Japan’s economic policy flexibility has diminished as a result of increased fiscal deficits and government debt, persistent deflation and a prospect of continued sluggish economic growth”, analysts at the firm said in a note. “It’s impossible to keep tolerating this massive spending,” said Takeshi Minami , chief economist at Norinchukin Research Institute in Tokyo. “Japan’s fiscal health will continue to be exceedingly severe given revenue won’t grow and a stagnant recovery may require additional economic measures.” A major reason for the squeeze is a plunge in prospective tax revenues due to the economic downturn and the drop in corporate profits. Tax revenues for fiscal 2010 are estimated to fall to ¥37.4 trillion, the same level as 26 years ago, in the mid-1980s — while corporate tax revenues are expected to be half the amount in normal years. As a result, the government has to raise ¥44.3 billion in new government bonds, compared to ¥53.5 trillion in FY2009. This leaves the treasury dependent on debt for 48% of the total budget, up 10 percentage points. At the end of the fiscal year, on March 31, 2011, the outstanding balance of government bond issues will have shot up to ¥637 trillion, the equivalent of 134% of Japan’s GDP while public debt will probably spiral to ¥973 trillion, almost double GDP.

“At the end of the fiscal year, on March 31, 2011, the outstanding balance of government bond issues will have shot up to ¥637 trillion, the equivalent of 134% of Japan’s GDP while public debt will probably spiral to ¥973 trillion, almost double GDP.”

According to the new government, the economic policies adopted by the previous ruling party, the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), failed on two fronts: initially boosting demand by increasing public investment, which was effective in the short term but not sustainable until the end of the 1990s. And later enhancing the supply side of the economy by deregulating the labour market and privatizing public entities, which simply widened the income gap within the economy, in the 2000s. However, the new budget was not well received by most observers. The announcement was rather sudden and lacked a comprehensive path to achieve the stated goals, they claim. Also, no reliable, specific incentives were offered, such as tax changes or deregulation that affect private sector behaviour.

More importantly, given its enormous debt, the government has limited room to offer any incentives without jeopardizing other parts of the economy. However, there was no mention of these painful trade-offs. In addition, while the budget contains some signs of change, there is concern that it may not adequately stimulate the economy. Most private sector economists believe that spending measures in the fiscal 2010 budget (and in the second fiscal 2009 supplementary budget) are expected to provide a limited boost to Japan’s GDP and to kick in no sooner than April. “Most private sector economists believe that spending measures in the fiscal 2010 budget are expected to provide a limited boost to Japan’s GDP and to kick in no sooner than April.”

Overall, the budget appears to be the result of a compromise between an attempt to impose some fiscal discipline and the promises made in last year’s summer election of new direct supports to households, such as child allowance, as well as concern over a double-dip recession. “Harsh financial conditions have prevented the administration from keeping all the promises that the DPJ made during its campaign last summer (for instance it has eliminated highway tolls and the gasoline tax). But the administration has succeeded, to some extent, in realizing the party’s slogan of “shifting weight to people from concrete” and its aim of providing more funds for households, rather than for industry-linked organizations and large-scale public works projects”, asserted in its editorial the Japan Times, one of the main national newspapers.

“Almost every move the government makes over the coming months must be seen against the backdrop of the crucial upper house election, which must be held in July for half of the seats.”

The budget must now be approved by Japan’s parliament before taking effect. Hatoyama’s popularity has dropped to 48% this month from 71% after he took the office in September. Almost every move the government makes over the coming months must be seen against the backdrop of the crucial upper house election, which must be held in July for half of the seats. So in the end the budget and its goals may be more dream than reality.

Shaw Capital Management March Newsletter: Japanese Government Submits Budget for Next Fiscal Year

Shaw Capital Management: Japanese Government Submits Budget for Next Fiscal Year

Japanese Government Submits Budget for Next Fiscal Year: Shaw Capital Management News



The Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) government submitted to the Diet the fiscal 2010 budget amounting to ¥92.3 trillion, its first budget since its inauguration in mid-September. The budget was even larger than its counterpart for the current fiscal year — which was already a record if one includes the second supplementary stimulus package, approved last December. This was because of additional spending on child allowances, free senior high school education, cash subsidies to farmers, and higher payments to medical institutions to alleviate the shortage of medical doctors. Particularly noteworthy is the large amount devoted to social security, up to ¥27.3 trillion, which account for 51% of general public spending … the first time that the social security share has exceeded 50%. In marked contrast, public works investment, which has been cut back by almost 20%, amounts to ¥5.8 trillion, a record drop that symbolizes the DPJ’s philosophy of shifting money to people from public works... eightynine dam projects are likely to be frozen.

At a news conference, Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama described it as “a budget meant to safeguard the life of the people.” He also claimed that three reforms were incorporated in the architecture of the budget: first, the principle of a shift of priority “from concrete to people”; second, initiatives taken by politicians instead of bureaucrats; and third, securing transparency in the budget formulation process. Some creditable aspects notwithstanding, the budget bill appears to be overshadowed, as media reports made clear, by concern over a severe revenue shortage and its implications for the future of Japan’s public finances, which are already debt-laden to a perilous extent as recently pointed out by credit rating agency Standard & Poor’s which raised the prospect of a downgrade in Japan’s sovereign debt rating. “The budget bill appears to be overshadowed by concern over a severe revenue shortage and its implications for the future of Japan’s public finances, which are already debt-laden to a perilous extent.” “Japan’s economic policy flexibility has diminished as a result of increased fiscal deficits and government debt, persistent deflation and a prospect of continued sluggish economic growth”, analysts at the firm said in a note.

“It’s impossible to keep tolerating this massive spending,” said Takeshi Minami , chief economist at Norinchukin Research Institute in Tokyo. “Japan’s fiscal health will continue to be exceedingly severe given revenue won’t grow and a stagnant recovery may require additional economic measures.” A major reason for the squeeze is a plunge in prospective tax revenues due to the economic downturn and the drop in corporate profits. Tax revenues for fiscal 2010 are estimated to fall to ¥37.4 trillion, the same level as 26 years ago, in the mid-1980s — while corporate tax revenues are expected to be half the amount in normal years. As a result, the government has to raise ¥44.3 billion in new government bonds, compared to ¥53.5 trillion in FY2009. This leaves the treasury dependent on debt for 48% of the total budget, up 10 percentage points.

 At the end of the fiscal year, on March 31, 2011, the outstanding balance of government bond issues will have shot up to ¥637 trillion, the equivalent of 134% of Japan’s GDP while public debt will probably spiral to ¥973 trillion, almost double GDP. “At the end of the fiscal year, on March 31, 2011, the outstanding balance of government bond issues will have shot up to ¥637 trillion, the equivalent of 134% of Japan’s GDP while public debt will probably spiral to ¥973 trillion, almost double GDP.”

According to the new government, the economic policies adopted by the previous ruling party, the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), failed on two fronts: initially boosting demand by increasing public investment, which was effective in the short term but not sustainable until the end of the 1990s. And later enhancing the supply side of the economy by deregulating the labour market and privatizing public entities, which simply widened the income gap within the economy, in the 2000s. However, the new budget was not well received by most observers. The announcement was rather sudden and lacked a comprehensive path to achieve the stated goals, they claim. Also, no reliable, specific incentives were offered, such as tax changes or deregulation that affect private sector behaviour. More importantly, given its enormous debt, the government has limited room to offer any incentives without jeopardizing other parts of the economy. However, there was no mention of these painful trade-offs. In addition, while the budget contains some signs of change, there is concern that it may not adequately stimulate the economy. Most private sector economists believe that spending measures in the fiscal 2010 budget (and in the second fiscal 2009 supplementary budget) are expected to provide a limited boost to Japan’s GDP and to kick in no sooner than April. “Most private sector economists believe that spending measures in the fiscal 2010 budget are expected to provide a limited boost to Japan’s GDP and to kick in no sooner than April.”

Overall, the budget appears to be the result of a compromise between an attempt to impose some fiscal discipline and the promises made in last year’s summer election of new direct supports to households, such as child allowance, as well as concern over a double-dip recession. “Harsh financial conditions have prevented the administration from keeping all the promises that the DPJ made during its campaign last summer (for instance it has eliminated highway tolls and the gasoline tax). But the administration has succeeded, to some extent, in realizing the party’s slogan of “shifting weight to people from concrete” and its aim of providing more funds for households, rather than for industry-linked organizations and large-scale public works projects”, asserted in its editorial the Japan Times, one of the main national newspapers. “Almost every move the government makes over the coming months must be seen against the backdrop of the crucial upper house election, which must be held in July for half of the seats.”

The budget must now be approved by Japan’s parliament before takingeffect. Hatoyama’s popularity has dropped to 48% this month from 71% after he took the office in September. Almost every move the government makes over the coming months must be seen against the backdrop of the crucial upper house election, which must be held in July for half of the seats. So in the end the budget and its goals may be more dream than reality.

Sunday, March 20, 2011

Government bond Markets: Shaw Capital Management February Newsletter

Government bond markets have ended 2009 on a very disappointing note. A further improvement in sentiment about the prospects for the global economic recovery, and indications that some central banks might be preparing to introduce early “exit strategies” from the measures that had been introduced to counter the recession, have been important factors in producing a more cautious attitude amongst bond investors. But a further significant consideration towards year-end has been the fear of possible defaults on sovereign debts after the decision by Dubai World, a government-owned company, to seek a moratorium on the servicing of its debts, and the downgrade in the credit rating of Greece because of its deteriorating fiscal situation.

Shaw Capital Management Korea February Newsletter: There was always the risk that the funding requirements resulting from recent policies, and particularly from the measures to counter the latest recession, would prove to be a massive burden for the global bond markets, and this has now proved to be the case. The Dubai government appears to have been rescued by help from Abu Dhabi; but it is still not clear whether there will be help for Greece and other periphery countries of the euro-zone that are in difficulties, and doubts have also been expressed about countries outside the euro-zone, including the UK, if central banks do not implement “exit strategies” carefully, and credible plans to reduce the massive fiscal deficits are not introduced fairly quickly.

Shaw Capital Management Korea February Newsletter: There was always the risk that the funding requirements resulting from recent policies would prove to be a massive burden for the global bond markets.

These doubts have already led to a significant widening of yield spreads on bonds of member countries of the euro-zone, with Greek bond yields now more than 2.5% higher than German bond yields; and even 10-year yields on US bonds and UK gilts have risen to the 4% level as investors have reduced their exposure.

Shaw Capital Management Korea February Newsletter: Our position on the prospects for the bond markets remains unchanged. We still expect that the recovery in the global economy will only develop at a very slow pace, and that “exit strategies” will only be introduced very gradually. The background situation will therefore continue to provide some support for bond markets.

But the timescale for the implementation of “exit strategies” is shortening; and the massive fiscal deficits are already placing great strains on the markets. The fears of defaults on sovereign debt may well be an overreaction; we expect, for example, that the weaker members of the eurozone will receive support from the stronger members to prevent defaults; but higher bond yields appear unavoidable. Prospects for all the major bond markets are therefore very unattractive.

Shaw Capital Management Korea February Newsletter: The performance of the US economy remains a critical factor in assessing those prospects, and the latest evidence has become more positive. The growth rate in the third quarter of the year has been revised down again; but since then there has been a lower-than-expected fall in non-farm payrolls, and an improvement in consumer sentiment that is reflected in a reasonable level of retail sales in the run-up to Christmas. Weaknesses remain, especially in manufacturing, and new house sales fell sharply in November; but a growth rate around 2% is expected this year. The Fed appears to agree with this more optimistic view, arguing in the statement after the latest meeting of its Open Market Committee that economic activity is continuing to pick up, and that the deterioration in the labour market is abating; but it is remaining very cautious. Interest rates are likely to be at low levels “for an extended period”, and the quantitative easing programme has been maintained, although some of the emergency liquidity measures will be withdrawn. It is clearly anxious to avoid doing anything that might harm the economic recovery. This should continue to provide some support for the bond market, even though the Fed will no longer be buying Treasuries and other corporate bonds; but it does appear that this will not be enough to offset the effects of the massive fiscal deficit, which is expected to reach $1.5 trillion this year, and to remain high well into the future.

Shaw Capital Management Korea February Newsletter: Debt issuance rose to over $2 trillion in 2009 to finance this deficit, and to replace maturing bonds; and the latest decision to take advantage of the unexpected windfall from the repayment of bank bail-out funds that are no longer needed to provide new resources for job creation is a clear indication that there are no plans to take early action to reduce the deficit.

It is not surprising therefore that bond investors have been reducing their exposure to the market, and that the yield curve has continued to steepen. In the absence of any change in policy, this process is likely to continue, and push overall yield levels even higher.

Article one of three.

Shaw Capital Management Korea - Investment Innovation & Excellence.  We provide the information; insight and expertise that you need to make the right investment choices. Shaw Capital Management based in Korea typically offers its clients such services as asset allocation and portfolio design; traditional and non-traditional manager review and selection; portfolio implementation; portfolio monitoring and consolidated performance reporting; and other wealth management services, including estate, tax, trust and insurance planning, asset custody, closely held business issues associated with the establishment or expansion of a family office, the formation of family investment partnerships or LLCs, philanthropy, family dynamics and inter-generation issues, etc.

Every investor will achieve better long-term risk-adjusted results by working with a true open architecture advisor.

Shaw Capital Management February Newsletter: Government bond Markets 3 of 3

Shaw Capital Management Korea February Newsletter:  Article three of three - The markets are assuming that the more powerful members of the eurozone will support the weaker members in order to prevent defaults that might threaten the single currency structure; but the yield spreads have widened considerably to reflect the increased risks. Our tentative view is that the markets will “muddle through”, and that defaults will be avoided; but higher overall yield levels seem unavoidable. Prospects in these markets are therefore very unattractive. The gilt edged market has also come under pressure over the past month; short-term yields have remained basically unchanged, but there have been increases in medium and longer-term yields that has produced a much steeper yield curve.

Shaw Capital Management Korea February Newsletter:  Article three of three - There has been evidence of a modest improvement in the economic background; and the Bank of England is proving to be a stabilising influence at a difficult time; but a very disappointing Pre-Budget Report has indicated that there will be no attempt to address the problems of the huge fiscal deficit until after the election. Our tentative view is that the markets will “muddle through”, and that defaults will be avoided; but higher overall yield levels seem unavoidable. Prospects in these markets are therefore very unattractive. Funding pressures will therefore continued to increase; and so, although there does not appear to be any real danger that the UK might join the list of countries that could default on their sovereign debts, annual debt issues in excess of £200 billion cannot continue for long if this is to be avoided. It is no surprise therefore that investors have reacted by reducing their exposure to the market.

Shaw Capital Management Korea February Newsletter:  Article three of three - There is still some doubt whether the UK economy has moved out of recession. The pace of contraction in the third quarter of the year has been slightly reduced, and since then the pace of job losses has declined, and consumer spending has held up fairly well. But business investment and manufacturing activity remains weak, and so there may have been no overall improvement in the final quarter of last year. The Bank of England has therefore kept short-term interest rates at 0.5%, and maintained its quantitative easing programme, and this has provided support for the market, since the bank has been a major buyer of gilts in recent months.

Shaw Capital Management Korea February Newsletter:  Article three of three - However it has not been enough to prevent a very adverse reaction to the Pre-Budget Report from the UK Chancellor. The market did not really expect any significant action on the deficit ahead of the forth-coming general election; but was still surprised by the apparent lack of realism. The government is prepared to allow the deficit to continue to accumulate, and is relying on the gilt edged market to provide the funds to finance that deficit in the hope that this will enable it to win the election, and has produced no real indications of how the deficit might be reduced even after the election is over. It is not surprising therefore that investors have reacted by reducing exposure, that 10-year yields have risen to 4% and longer-term yields to 4.5%, and that there are even suggestions that the country could face a capital flight and a full-blown debt crisis in the coming months. We do not share these extreme views; but clearly the prospects for the market are very unattractive, and higher yields appear unavoidable. Investors have reacted by reducing exposure... and there are even suggestions that the country could face a capital flight and a fullblown debt crisis in the coming months.

Shaw Capital Management Korea February Newsletter:  Article three of three - The Japanese bond market is basically unchanged over the past month; but there are fears that present yield levels are unsustainable. A sharp reduction in the growth estimate for the third quarter of last year, and weaknesses since then have raised the possibility of a move back into recession and a further period of deflation. The government has reacted by launching its fourth fiscal rescue package since the economic crisis began last year. It amounts to the equivalent of a further $81 billion to be spent in the regions and on subsidies for consumer durables, and is expected to lift the debt issuance this year to a record $835 billion, despite the indications that bond investors may be becoming increasingly unwilling to finance such a high level of new bonds, and the warning from the IMF that the government is risking a significant increase in debt funding costs. Since overseas involvement in the bond market is at a very low level, such a development is unlikely to affect bond markets elsewhere directly; but it could be a warning to other countries of the dangers of placing too much pressure on their own markets.

Shaw Capital Management Korea - Investment Innovation & Excellence.  We provide the information, insight and expertise that you need to make the right investment choices. Shaw Capital Management based in Korea typically offers its clients such services as asset allocation and portfolio design; traditional and non-traditional manager review and selection; portfolio implementation; portfolio monitoring and consolidated performance reporting; and other wealth management services, including estate, tax, trust and insurance planning, asset custody, closely held business issues associated with the establishment or expansion of a family office, the formation of family investment partnerships or LLCs, philanthropy, family dynamics and inter-generation issues, etc.

Every investor will achieve better long-term risk-adjusted results by working with a true open architecture advisor.

Government bond Markets Part 2 of 3: Shaw Capital Management Newsletter

Shaw Capital Management Korea February Newsletter:  Article two of three - Bond markets in mainland Europe have also fallen back towards year-end. There are signs of a modest improvement in the background economic situation in the euro-zone; and this seems to be persuading the European Central Bank to withdraw some of the liquidity measures that it introduced to counter the recession as part of a general tightening of monetary policy that might soon include higher short-term interest rates.

Shaw Capital Management Korea February Newsletter:  Article two of three - But a more serious immediate consideration for the markets has been the decision by some of the rating agencies to downgrade the credit rating of Greek government bonds, and to warn that other periphery member countries of the euro-zone have been placed on “credit watch” and might suffer the same fate. Investors have responded by widening the yield spreads between the bonds of member countries, and by pushing the overall level of yields higher. The markets appear to be expecting that the process will continue. The Fed appears to agree with this more optimistic view, arguing that economic activity is continuing to pick up, and that the deterioration in the labour market is abating. For weaknesses elsewhere.

Shaw Capital Management Korea February Newsletter:  Article two of three - There is also a fear that the contraction that is occurring in banking lending, and in the money supply, may be leading to another credit crunch this year that could extend the economic slowdown. Bank loans to businesses were 1.9% lower in November 2009 than in same month in 2008, and M3 money supply was 0.2% lower, and has been shrinking now for several months. Since an expansion in banking lending was a major plank in the European Central Bank’s efforts to combat the recession, this latest evidence of a contraction is a major policy failure, and should be persuading the ECB to move very slowly in dismantling its emergency measures; but all the evidence suggests that it is preparing to act. The latest meeting of its governing council left short-term interest rates and overall monetary policy unchanged; but subsequently the bank chairman argued that some of the existing liquidity measures were no longer needed and would be gradually replaced. This was a disappointment for bond investors, not only because such action might be premature and extend the recession, but also because some of the funds that had been made available had been used to support government bond issues.

Shaw Capital Management Korea February Newsletter:  Article two of three - However the more serious consideration was the downgrade of Greece’s credit rating, and the threat that other member countries of the euro-zone might receive similar treatment because of the increased risk of defaults. Bond issues in the zone reached the equivalent of $1350 billion in 2009, and are likely to exceed that figure this year, with Greece alone needing to sell $83 billion, and likely to try to rely on overseas investors for at least half the funds.

Article part two of three.

Shaw Capital Management Korea - Investment Innovation & Excellence.  We provide the information; insight and expertise that you need to make the right investment choices. Shaw Capital Management based in Korea typically offers its clients such services as asset allocation and portfolio design; traditional and non-traditional manager review and selection; portfolio implementation; portfolio monitoring and consolidated performance reporting; and other wealth management services, including estate, tax, trust and insurance planning, asset custody, closely held business issues associated with the establishment or expansion of a family office, the formation of family investment partnerships or LLCs, philanthropy, family dynamics and inter-generation issues, etc.
Every investor will achieve better long-term risk-adjusted results by working with a true open architecture advisor.

Tuesday, March 8, 2011

Shaw Capital Management Factoring:Info: Avoid Scam on Asset Based Financing

Two types of asset based financing for your information to avoid factoring scams. For Working Capital. Shaw Capital Management and Financing offers asset based lending for companies that need to maximize their borrowing capacity using accounts receivable and inventory as collateral. Receivable based financing combined with inventory finance has become a useful tool for many undercapitalized businesses.
Shaw Capital Management and Financing evaluate a client’s business assets as its primary focus to establish the borrowing base. The result is usually far greater borrowing power than can be achieved from a traditional cash flow banking approach due to our expertise in industry specialization.
Bank Financing. Shaw Capital Management and Financing offer higher advance rates due to our experience in receivable valuation. In the event where the client already has a bank line of credit, an Inter-creditor agreement is made between the bank and Shaw Capital Management and Financing where the receivables are assigned to Shaw Capital Management and Financing and therefore allows the client to borrow at higher advance rates.
“Due to the recession, many businesses have seen their credit rating dwindle and in most instances, the credit of small businesses is based off of the business owner’s personal credit rating. Small businesses have not been the only businesses that have been affected by the recession and stricter lending standards however. Many large scale companies are getting rejecting for unsecured loans that they would have qualified for five to ten years ago.
After the markets started crashing a few years ago, most people thought that asset based lending and subprime loan companies would be put out of business forever. While subprime mortgage lending took a big hit, it has been found out that asset based lending for businesses is actually making a big comeback. With credit companies refusing to issue loans to companies that they may have leant to prior to the recession, businesses have had to find a way to obtain the financing that they need. Asset based lending companies have stepped in full force and are quickly growing in popularity.
Asset loans use a company’s liquid assets to determine whether or not they are going to lend to them rather than using a credit score. Credit scores are still obtained but they are not the ultimate and definitive deciding factor with asset based lending. Liquid assets can be defined as the company’s equipment, accounts receivable, restaurant assets and in some cases even real estate if it is owned by the business. The business enters into a contract that uses their assets as collateral in the event that they ever default on the loan. What used to be considered subprime lending is now becoming a very popular and widely used method of obtaining loans for business owners.
There are a few downfalls to pass around to asset based lending as well. The first major downfall is that if the business defaulted on the loan, then the lender has the right to seize physical assets and future payments that are due to the company depending on what asset is being held in collateral. Second, the interest rates are often above 10%, which is typically higher than standard lending rates. And last, the lending limits may be lower than traditional lending, as most asset based lending companies will only lend an average of 60% of the value of physical and hard assets and 80% of the value of future accounts receivables. By Vanessa Sweeney”
Shaw Capital Management and Financing provide same-day-funding. We can help you meet your cash flow needs immediately without entering into a long term factoring relationship. The money you get for the freight bills we purchase is payment in full.
Shaw Capital Management and Financing offer a complete line of factoring services, purchase order funding, and asset based financing, accounts receivable management, and other related financial services.
Shaw Capital Management and Financing offer funding for a wide range of industries and flexible funding requirements that most businesses can easily qualify for.
Based in Baltimore, Maryland. Importing into the tri-state area mostly from the far east such as China, Thailand, Taiwan and South Korea.